Half-Elves maintained their position as the best race for multiclassing in AD&D 2E. Half-Elves had nine potential multiclass combinations, which put them far ahead of elves (four combos), gnomes (three combos), dwarves (two combos), and halflings (one combo).
Half-Elves could also multiclass as clerics, which was nearly unique. While dwarves were allowed the cleric/fighter combo, half-elves could become a cleric/fighter, cleric/ranger, cleric/mage, and cleric/fighter/mage. They were also the only demi-humans able to multiclass as rangers and druids, although only as the aforementioned cleric/ranger or as a druid/fighter.
Clearly the ability of half-elves to multiclass and their aptitude as clerics was a the real advantage of playing half-elves.
Which probably explains why D&D 3E broke half-elves so badly. With the new multiclass rules crippling the only advantage of playing a half-elf, they simply became the poor cousin to full-blooded elves. When D&D 3.5 came out, they attempted to fix half-elves by giving them a +2 to Diplomacy and Gather Information. This was simply not enough.
Which brings us to D&D 4E. Admittedly, I think the half-elves in D&D 4E are a big improvement over 3E. Their Dilettante ability is not only immensely useful, but it harkens back to their old multiclass abilities. Still, there was something that bugged me about them that I couldn’t put my finger on for a long time.
When I finally did, it was obvious. In fact, it was right there in the first paragraph:
Play a Half-Elf if you want...
to be an outgoing, enthusiastic leader.
to be a charismatic hero equally at home in two different cultures.
to be a member of a race that favors the warlord, paladin, and warlock classes.
What bugged me is that half-elves do not make good clerics or rangers! The cleric/ranger multiclass was extremely popular in AD&D, as were all the other cleric multiclass combinations.
The nice thing is that this is easily fixable. As they stand in the Player’s Handbook, half-elves get a +2 Charisma, +2 Constitution. The choice of +2 Constitution seems a little odd to me. as I have never seen half-elves as especially hardy. In fact, the only reason I can think of to give them +2 Constitution is because all of the Player’s Handbook 1 races, except humans, have one good physical and one good mental ability.
On the other hand, many half-elves in fiction, from Elrond to Tanis Half-Elven, have been described as wise. Giving half-elves a +2 Charisma, +2 Wisdom suddenly makes clerics and rangers viable choices again. Since this doubling up of bonuses to either physical or mental abilities is common in the Player’s Handbook 2 races, I am not worried that I am breaking any unwritten rule of 4E race design.
I will be the first to admit that this may be a problem that only exists in my mind. Nevertheless, I feel it is a minor tweak that goes a long way towards making half-elves in D&D 4E feel like “old-school” half-elves.
5 comments:
It works, and you don't need to worry about stepping on any toes -- there are no PC races currently that offer +2 Wis/+2 Cha, and it's a little underpowered if anything, because both of those stats contribute to the same non-AC defense, Will.
However, I feel the need to point out that half-elves never made very good clerics. It's true that they stood out because of their ability to be clerics at all, but in first edition, their level limit was a whopping 5. After that, your cleric/fighter/mage was just a fighter/mage who got 2/3 the normal xp (the remaining 1/3 going to the unable-to-advance cleric class). Similarly, the cleric/ranger would turn into a half-speed ranger after level 5/5.
Second edition increased this limit a little, but only to 11 or so, IIRC. Still not a great choice.
It's a little funny that elves now make better clerics than half-elves, but half-elves were never really that good at it.
Fair enough on the cleric level limits for half-elves. My view on the subject may be a little skewed by the fact that my college DM used an optional rule from the 2E DMG that allowed characters to exceed their level limits by spending double XP to advance.
As a result I ran a couple of Cleric/Rangers in 2E and became a fan of the combination.
What do you think about a half-elf Barbarian/Ranger multiclass character?
@Korak: Thematically, I don't have any problem with a half-elf Barbarian Ranger. The two classes are very similar but I can see the combo working out.
Depending on what edition of D&D you are playing, they may not make as much sense from a number crunching point of view.
Assuming you are using the half-elf rules as written (RAW) in D&D 4E, they actually don't make half-bad barbarians since they boost both secondaries. They make less impressive rangers in RAW though.
On the other hand, my version of the half-elf does slightly better as a ranger, but not as well as a barbarian.
Of course, in D&D 3E the combo should work well as long as you have the proper stats.
This is an old thread, but for those looking for information (as I was) I will comment to expand this some.
Yes in AD&D 1e originally Half-elf clerics were very limited, but Unearthed Arcana increase the levels to up to 8th with 18 Wisdom and 10th if one gets to 19 Wisdom. Do not forget that Wisdom is the only attribute that is allowed to go above 18 due to aging.
Now if you stick to the written rules; Unearthed Arcana did make Half-Elves a waste of time. This is due to the fact that Elves were better than Half-Elves in almost every way and ability to rise up in Class.
Post a Comment